This week, we’re looking at a new AI product that promises to do what ChatGPT can’t: talk to you about building guns.
The cleverly named GatGPT went into beta this week. I got an early look at it. And, now, we’re having the head of the company behind it on the show to explain why they created it.
Defense Distrubuted’s Cody Wilson said the end goal is to build an alternative to big tech initiatives in search and advertising. He argued AI could be a consequential tool in that effort. He said the kind of censorship ChatGPT has been saddled with, which keeps it from talking about guns and other topics its parent company OpenAI views as controversial, is holding back the mainstream efforts and gives GatGPT a potential edge.
However, it does still suffer from some of the same accuracy issues other major AIs struggle with. Wilson said they hope to continuously improve GatGPT with beta testers and high-quality data from sections of the online firearms community.
Wilson has garnered media attention and controversy since he first printed a gun back in 2013. He managed to retain his gun rights and take back control of Defense Distributed despite pleading guilty to a sex crime in 2018. His latest move shows he’s remained as media savvy and controversial as ever, though.
Unlike many other AI startups, Wilson said he isn’t looking to sell hype and bring in investors at unrealistic valuations. But he is hoping to create a viable business model around the uncensored AI model. One he hopes can benefit the entire firearms industry, which he says has been “ghettoized” by large tech platforms for over a decade.
Plus, Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I discuss USCCA’s latest foray into the political realm.
You can listen to the show on your favorite podcasting app or by clicking here. Video of the episode is available on our YouTube channel. Reload Members get access on Sunday, as always. Everyone else can listen when the episode goes public on Monday.
One Response
Interesting! Do I have an issue with Cody Wilson’s personal history? Do I think it mitigates his ability to contribute to the cause of personal individual empowerment and fundamental Human rights? nope. That’s not my job. I am not interested in “casting” or throwing stones at other folks personal or legal issues. There are all kinds of folks in my sphere of influence who have issues in their lives that are offensive to someone else. “ALL have sinned and fallen short”. limiting your allies to the folks that are NOT on that list makes for a very small list of friends and allies. I endeavor to engage folks with who they are right now. Is it extra work to move our ball forward? sure! But for some folks, I require extra work.